![]() Relative to that question, the answer is simply No, there aren't any i3's with vt-d. I almost caveated my answer by mentioning these, but simply decided against it since they're such special-purpose chips and it was crystal clear that the real question was whether there were any Socket 1155 i3's that would work in his motherboard. They do not use a standard Socket (they're socket 1284 chips) and certainly won't work in any motherboard that's likely to be used for an UnRAID system. Rather, individual driver teams run the conformance tests and submit their results on a set of hardware on a particular operating system. These are special case embedded CPU's that Intel included vt-d on for very specific communications and cryptographic infrastructure applications. Yes, I'm sure about that - and I WAS aware of these two individual exceptions. ![]() Here's a 2nd gen i3 that supports vtx and vtd: the cost difference will fade from memory, and you'll definitely get used to the higher performance Core i3 or Celeron have the VT-d required for Pass-thru? I guess I'm limited to E3-12X0 or E3-12X0v2 ?Īnyone knows if a 2nd Gen. I need a new CPU that will let me pass-thru the GPU and USB to the VM. The "host" would be Unraid 6 Pro with only 1 VM (this one) running Windows 8.1 or 10 (after July 29th). I needed to be able to use the VM by just opening the Monitor and start using keyboard/mouse. So, what would be a recommendation for a basic Streaming Client Steam and i'll use the VM as a desktop PC in my Office. Per Intel's spec, for platforms using C202/C204 PCH:Ģ) Intel E3-12x5 series processors which have integrated graphics support are not recommended. Intel® Xeon® processor E3-1200 & v2 series, Intel® 2nd Gen and 3rd Gen Core i3, Intel® Pentium® and Celeron processors This is the info from the Supermicro site regarding CPU compatibility : My Mobo is a Supermicro X9SCL+-F that use Intel C202. Disk write performance inside the VM seems to be one area of impact, but we are still experimenting with further tuning settings to see if we can improve this. ![]() That said, the Hyper-V extensions in Windows may impact performance in other areas which we are still researching. If your primary interest is gaming performance, this is the recommended approach. I guess they haven't added the latest driver from NVIDIA to their supported database yet, because the other tests were just fine.įrom the tests I ran, the numbers show a better result with latest drivers and no hyper-v settings in the VM. I ran the last test twice because the 3D Mark site said my "graphics driver was not approved" but it said it again the second time. Test #3b: 347.88 drivers w/ Hyper-V Settings Off Test #3a: 347.88 drivers w/ Hyper-V Settings Off Test #2: 340.52 drivers w/ Hyper-V Settings Off Test #1: 340.52 drivers w/ Hyper-V Settings On To test this, I used 3D Mark's Fire Strike benchmark and re ran tests with various settings. Since this is a topic that seems to come up more and more lately, I wanted to do some quick testing for folks to see what toggling between Hyper-V extensions and the 340.52 vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |